realizată de Alain Garrido 15 ani în urmă
606
Mai multe ca aceasta
Undue harship
Requisites
more than 20 employees
Over 50
Supervisors harassment
300000
more than 500
50000
100
Retaliation by employer
Empoyee demands cannot fire him
Harasers fail to follow the policies
Reasonable care to prevent sexual harassment
Hostile environment
Quid pro quo
sexual favors
Peer pressure
No reverse discrimination
Section 1981
More damages
Against Majority group
Prohibited
Practice that affects members of a protected class
plaintiff must present causal link
Defense
Justified
Prima facie
Rate of Hiring
4/5
Pool of applicants
Prima Face Case
Shifts burden of the proof to the defendant
Defensive reason to hire someone else
Pretext
Someone out of her protected class takes the job
Rejected
Applied and qualified
Member of protected class
Disparate-treatment discrimination
Reasonable Accomodation
Unless
Undue Harship
Huge Economic loss
Pregnancy is included
Equal pay Act