av Oscar Ferdinando Andria 4 år siden
225
Mer som dette
Hyrogliphs are by nature primary sources, but what they describe is secondary because what they mean has to be be translated.
The translation of the hieroglyphs is a secondary source because the historians had to guesstimate what each hieroglyph meant, and re-construct the language based on a limited reference point, being the story on the stone.
The Rosetta Stone is a primary source because it's a relic from that specific era.
The production of this source involved the writing process by the original author of the text upon The Rosetta Stone. The validation came from the historians assessing the source, and examining if it can be a genuine source for better understanding the Egyptians. Reception of The Rosetta Stone involves the consensus of an outside party on the translation of The Rosetta Stone. Dissemination of the historical source The Rosetta Stone, involves spreading the information. For example through exhibiting it and teaching about it. And revision refers to how it has to be looked at from multiple perspectives, and assessed multiple times so that a better perception and interpretation of it can be reached.
Structural evidence CAN BE TRACKED BACK IN TIME - EXPERTS ARE CAPABLE OF UNDERSTANDING HOW OLD THE MATERIALS USED IN THE STRUCTURES ARE, THEIR CURRENT STATE AND THE CHANGE GENERATED BY THE PASSING OF TIME TO TRACK THEIR CREATION - MATCH THESE FINDINGS WITH OTHER PROOF (such as writings, drawings, etc.) TO NOTICE TRENDS IN CULTURAL BELIEFS AND BEHAVIOR