LEGAL INTERPRETIVISM VS LEGAL POSITIVISM - Mind Map

LEGAL INTERPRETIVISM VS LEGAL POSITIVISM

SIMILARITIES

Add your text

Add your text

Add your text

Add your text

Add your text

Add your text

Add your text

Add your text

LEGAL POSITIVISM

FEATURES

BASIS

MAIN IDEA^

law is

not inherent in nature

of pre-interpretive identification

what lawyers aim to construct in their practice

no division between law and morality

MAIN CONTRIBUTORS

, interpretivism includes even the theses of

osef Esser,

Theodor Viehweg,

Chaim Perelman,

Wolfgang Fikentscher,

ntónio Castanheira Neves

Friedrich Müller,

Aulis Aarnio,

Add your text

CASE EXAMPLE

Riggs v. Palmer

ADVANTAGES

show indispensability of theoretical ascent.

satisfies two standards of “clarity and system”

better justice to the reflective nature of legal reasoning

subjective views, emotions, opinions and values of the people ARE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION

Enables understanding

flexible

DRAWBACK

RESEARCH METHOD

QUALITATIVE

ethnographic studies

unstructured interviews

participant observations

focus groups.

CHARACTERISTICS

FOUNDER

dworkin in his book law empire author^

DEFINITION

more than rules to law,

moral principles guide the law

DISSIMILARITIES

Add your text

Add your text

Add your text

Add your text

Add your text

Add your text

Add your text

Add your text

LEGAL INTERPRETIVISM

FEATURES

BASIS

Positivism -based on the concepts of rules

. Power is

main basis-validities the law

main working purpose of the law.

created -figure in authority

imposition of sanctions

concept of power is centralised

MAIN IDEA

stablish A STUDY OF NATURE OF LAW DISENTAGLED WITH HOW

CASE EXAMPLE

ADVANTAGES^

CLEAR AND UNBIASED EXPLANATION^

In a culturally plural society like india,

legal positivism is important because morality is a subjective term differs from one culture to another

, the separation of law and morality

one the feature of positivism.

legal positivism is important

Hold the integrity and unity of a DVERSIFIE country

character of positivism becomes relevant in India,

with positivism the law which is established is accepted as it is without any moral qualification.

as for different group’s “what ought to be law” differs from another. .

MAIN CONTRIBUTORS

Jeremy Bentham

John Austin

Kelsen

Fuller

DRAWBACKS

RIGID

NOT EASY TO CHALLENGE AND CHANGE LAWS

fails to give morality its due.

nability to accurately prove hypotheses through empirical experiments

RESEARCH METHOD

QUANTITIAVE RESEARCH

structured questionnaires,

statistics,

numerical data

surveys

methods - reliable and accurate.

CHARACTERISTICS

Separability Thesis .

shares features with morality .

does not depend upon morality for its justification

Pedigree Thesis.

2. Law is a social invention.

Various methods in determination social authority

social facts establish what qualifies as law.

3.existence thesis,

3 law presupposes its effectiveness

FOUNDER

roots -political philosophies of Hobbes and Hume,

important architects of contemporary legal positivism

Austrian jurist- Hans Kelsen

two dominating figures in analytic philosophy of law,

H.L.A. Hart (1907–92)

Joseph Raz,

first elaboration - Jeremy Bentham

DEFINITION

existence and content of law depends on social facts

depends not on its merits

Emphasizes conventional nature of law

Add your text

CASE EXAMPLE

Michigan v. Johnson^

laws of Nazi Germany

orally unfair

legally legitimate

TYPES OF LEGAL POSITIVISM

Add your text

Add your text

Cliquez ici pour centrer votre carte.
Cliquez ici pour centrer votre carte.