Chapter3 Planning and desgining research projects

The research process

1.Selecting the topic

Personal interest

r

The responsiblilty and position of the researchers

adventage

the knowledge

r

the knowledge of the phenomenon that the researcher already has

the possibility

r

the possibility of access to individuals and further information

the high level of motivation

r

the high level of motivation which can be brought to the research

disadeantage

biased

unable to view the situation

r

The researcher unable to view the situation as objectively as prior interest or knowledge

The literature

Example

r

Example: a tested theory, a theory related to manufacture not service organisations, a theory created by entire men, not women,

Policy or management

r

The difference: Confidential and not examined wider implication by organisationPublic and more general implication by academics

organisations

academics

Social concern

deprived or neglected groups

the environment

the health needs of outworkers

Popular issues

Motivation

r

Some social issue may stimulate the social research

2.Review the literature

Roles

r

The entire basis of the research, a source of ideas on topics for research, a source of information research done by others, a source of methodological or theoretical ideas, a source of comparison between your research and that of others, a source of information that is an intergral or supportive part of the research

Risk

r

Some research might be replicated based on the historyComparsion between Los Angels and SydneyConclusion: Even the same topic or the same research, different enviroment may cause the different research.

Ongoing

r

The research is ongoing and unpredicable by the actived communcation such as annual reportsm newspaper or websites.

Summary and conclusion

3.Devising a conceptual framework

Concepts

The building blocks

Concept, definition, operationalisation

r

How to understand the concept, definition and operationlisation

Conceptual framework

Identification of concepts

starting point

iterative

going backwards and forwards between the elements

Definition of concepts

Exploration of relationships between concepts

use concept map

Operationalisation of the concepts

measured , if quantitative in nature

assessed, if qualitative in nature

Whether the research is

Descriptive

Explanatory

Evaluative

Theoretical framework: T=a+bE

r

T is the concept staff turenoverE is the concept size of organisationa and b are parameters.

4.Deciding research questions

From concept map to research questions

relationship between concepts//variables

influences

Job satisfaction affect organisational commitment

organisational commitment influence staff turnover

research questions

the scale and scope of the implied research program

answerability of the question

scale and scope

r

What kind of the problems could provide a basis for more detailed or extensive research?

Answerability

Theoretical

Big issue

Research questions/manageable subprojects

Practical terms

the resources available to the researcher

Primary and subsidiary questions

Primary

Subsidiary questions

Personal characteristics

Job characteristics

Research questions vs objectives

The objectives of the research

the relative influences

job satisfaction affects organisational commitment

organisational commitment influences the level of staff turnover

Research question vs hypotheses

Research question

Hypothesis to be tested

r

For example: What is the relationship between advertising expenditure and revenue?A hypothesis dealing with the same topic might be expressed as:There is a postive relationship between advertising expenditure and revenue.

Hypotheses

r

Hypotheses are stated in the form that predict a difference between two groups in relation to some variable, or that there is a relationship between two variables.For example: There is a difference between the organisational commitment of male employees and female employess.There is a relationship between job satisfaction and salary level.

Non-directional hypotheses

r

They do not need to predict the direction of the difference or relationship.

Directional hypotheses

r

Example: Female employees have a higher level of organisational commitment than male employees.There is a postive relationship between job satisfaction and salary level.Directional hypotheses are two kinds: a higher level of commitment and a postive relationship.

Confident about the direction of a relationship

Differences in a particular direction

Experimental research

a null hypothesis

No difference between two group

No relationship between two variables

Statistical analysis

null hypothesis probably true

null hypothesis probably false

5. Listing information needs and operationalising

r

A list of the information needs should be important to rise. The concept of operationalising concepts is to decide how a concept or variable is to measured.Notice: Identified or assessed would be more appropriate than measured.

6. Developing a research strategy

Information-gathering methods

r

After the research collect the methods, they will plan the data collection process. They also need to consider whether the process is out into the field and the planning of the fieldworkExample: The pilot study planning process is not only the wording of questionaire, but also discover the duration of the process, because the duration may affect the budget or the scale of data gathering

Utilisation of existing information

Experimental and observation methods

Qualitative methods

Questionnaire-based surveys

Data analysis methods

r

In some case study, the analysis of data, thoughts and skills are very complex and needed to be undertaken. When the researchers collect the qualitative data, thoughts must be given as how the results of the interviews will be analysed.

Budget and timetable

r

Because of the budget and timetable, the research is limited to reach.Example: Student research, consultancy research, some other projects.

7. Conducting the research

r

Good research; good preparationBad research; inexperienced researchers, too rapid preparation, no convinced

8. Reporting findings

r

Reporting the research and writing the research as sonn as possible

Research proposals

r

Ten elements of proposal:What, how , when, who, how many and how many, extra.The most important principle is to address the brief.

Self-generated proposal

r

Projects: Undergraduate, PHD thesis or a funded projectCases study: Using some reasonable detail or elements on the literarure or research

Academics seeking funding

r

describe the research

provide a rationale choice

Students seeking approval

Responsive proposal

Consultants

r

Potential Consultants: through the advertisement, they will be asked some questions to indicate an expression of interest in the project which is a brief statement of the consultants' ability, experience and staff.

Submission of a written proposal or tender

Submit a detail tender

basis of price

quality of proposal

track record

Briefs

r

Limited,but brief can indicate proposals

Client organisations

r

The client's meaning and intentionsDicussion: the relationship between the client organisations and their requirements. If the clients ask many requirements, what kind of problems will rise?

Agenda

r

Management agenda.

Students

Planners and managers

Research ethics

r

Plagiarism and honesty in reporting of resultsThere are codes of ethics that regulate the people's activties to protect the human beings or animals who might be researched. If someone involve the activities, they will be pulished such as litigation or indemnity.Example: The Academy of Management publishes its Cod of Ethical Conduct annually in the December issue of the Academy of Management Journal.

Harm

Confidentiality or privacy

r

Issue: Although some surveys are not involved in the related reponsders' information because of the three parties among the surveys and the anonymous interviews, some people still can get the the reponsders' information inevitably. Solution: Using the false names or numbers which is involved in individuals, organisations, events, places and communities to aviod the leak of information.

Free choice

r

Solution: It depends on the researchers' background.

Moral pressure on the university students

Captive group

r

Example: Apprentices, members of organisations, prisoners and some patients in hospitals

Governments' census

Some research used in anti-social behaviour

Informed consent

Researchers' responsibility

r

Only the researchers can recognize the usage of the information that the respondents provide. They must promise that they couldn't abuse the information in some illegal situations which means they must obey some guidelines and monitor what might happen to the information.

Examples in the physical and mental risks

r

Example; Some research should be informed to be objected to be put in the front of the pubilc.Students should be informed that which organisation will be the beneficiary of the research.

Grey areas

r

Example: Racism or gender bias

Guideline of a good survey

r

An example: Be anonymousShort interviewNo danger and no privacyhappen in the management Suggested guideline in suvery: To show the interviewers' names Briefed questions so that interviewees can answer easilySome self-description of the purpose of the project in the paperInterviewers should introduce themselves firstThe interviewers should give the respondents the phone numberPrepare some short handout for the respondents

General research ethics

Competence

r

Whatever interviewers or organisation that will do the interview, they should have the skills or competence to promise that they would not hurt the respondents

Literature review

r

Ensure the research through the literature which is entire

Plagiarism

Appropriate acknowledgement

Falsification of results

r

The research shouldn't be falsified.