Assessing Credibility of Sources
Does the author cite their research?
Are the sources cited by the author reliable?
in-text citations are provided
What is the purpose of the source?
How might the purpose of the source affect the content?
persuade
entertain
or provide evidence
Does the author present alternative conclusions?
Are conflicting viewpoints discussed in the article?
What are other Historians saying about the author?
Are there any conflicting views on the author's credibility?
Positive or negative opinions about the author's work?
Who supports the author's credibility as a historian?
Is the author well-respected among historians?
Do other historians agree with the author's arguments?
Are there any criticisms or controversies surrounding the author?
Have other historians cited the author's work in their research?
What is the general consensus among historians about the author's reliability?
What relevant qualifications or experience does the author have?
Is the author's expertise connected to the subject?
Does the author include multiple perspectives?
Are there any perspectives that are left out?